Liberals say the hack of the Democratic National Committee was done by Russian cybercriminals.
Conservatives say the hack of the Democratic National Committee was done by Democrats to form an excuse for a lost election.
And in a bombshell report, the “Russia collusion” narrative was completely obliterated.
A new report states categorically that the Democratic National Committee (DNC) was not hacked by Russians — or anyone else — as frequently alleged by the mainstream media, liberal scholars and anti-Trump politicians.
The Nation‘s Patrick Lawrence wrote a lengthy review of the findings made by various computer experts formerly with the NSA. Published this week, the left-wing magazine’s report notes two bases for their conclusion:
- Hard science shows that a remote hack of the DNC servers resulting in the breach that actually occurred would have been technologically impossible.
- Forensic review of the initial Guccifer 2.0 documents proves that they are poorly-disguised cut-and-paste jobs — forgeries — intended to finger Russia.
Lawrence, by way of the experts’ findings, concludes that the so-called “hack” was actually an inside job by someone with internal access to the DNC’s computer network.
In other words, the DNC has (or had) a leak.
And Seth Rich could very well have been the one who nabbed the emails and then submitted them to Wikileaks, ultimately exposing the corruption, malice, and darkness of the DNC and Hillary Clinton campaign.
SHARE on Facebook and Twitter if you agree that the Russia collusion narrative is baloney!